The Argument

Last week we only had one meeting. Since all material had already done, we used the only meeting in the last week to review our work in the topic of Argumentative Paragraph.
The one I reviewed was Fitriyatuz Zakiyah's writing. There was not any enormous mistakes in hers. Everything were all clear. Her paragraph had stated the characteristic of the paragraph we reviewed about. But, as what we have done before, there were some simple misplacing on punctuation. This mistakes is very common among us. Me, myself often do the same mistakes. So, I think we better pay more attention on our writing's punctuation in order to make our writing better.. :)
Keep Spiritt.. ;)

Nobody Is Perfect

We had workshop for both first and second meeting in this week. Since we had done all presentation.
We reviewed about process analysis in the first meeting. I reviewed Aris' work. He told about how to cook rice. I had some difficulties to understand his paragraph. Perhaps it was because I didn't know some words he used in his. I also found something incorrect in her sentence structure and punctuation. The way how he used adjective clause was a bit confusing me. But I thought it was because the very minimum amount of fullstop in his paragraph. After I read again, I could understand what he meant and I could give him explanation about my opinion for his paragraph.
The second one which I reviewed was Iswatin's paragraph. The type was definition. Her writing was defined about iqab in Sunan Ampel al-'Ali Islamic Boarding School. Hers was generally good and easy to be understood. But, yeeaahh... nobody is perfect. I still found some simple fault in it. The fault was the one which I almost always found in others' writing and also mine.
So, Let's be better with simple things..

Week of the Last Presentation

We had three meetings last week. Our first meeting was workshop about cause and effect paragraph. We worked in pair as usual. My partner in this topic was Fia. her paragraph talked about the effect that caused by facebook social networking. Generally her paragraph was good enough. But I found some simple mistakes in punctuation and using capital letter. She didn't use the capital letter in the place it should be used and use it when it was not needed. When I asked her about this matter, she said that it have been her habit to write in that style. For she gave this reason I could not said anything but to change her habit. Since this habit was not good for writing.
The second meeting was used for the last three presentation. The presenter were Trias, Lilis, and Zaky. Trias presented paragraph which she thought it was persuasive. Almost the whole class member disagreed with her because her paragraph only persuade in the end not in the entire paragraph. Finally we got a conclusion that hers was exposition paragraph. The next presenter was Lilis who presented two paragraphs. There was not any problem in her first paragraph. But we found the problem in her second one. The problem was about the topic. The following and the last presenter was Zaky. Her paragraph was clear in type. Therefore no one disagreed with her argument about the type of her paragraph.
We had second workshop in the third meeting. The workshop was about classification. I reviewed Lalang's paragraph. His paragraph was so brief and quite short. It was about kinds of animal based on the way they gave birth their children. The mistakes was not so far from the matter of punctuation. Then I thought we have to be more aware about this simple but important thing.